home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for ninjashogun, 1788 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Tue Mar 04 23:12:19 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   well, congratulations

Tue Mar 04 23:10:57 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   sorry I don't know how to read "assbot"

Tue Mar 04 23:10:52 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   is that a 38,625 BTC transaction investing in s.mpoe?

Tue Mar 04 23:09:39 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   publicly*

Tue Mar 04 23:08:59 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   mircea_popescu, your style is 100% different from anything I've seen in my (albeit limited) interaction with business or investors. Your post quotes yourself, saying that you would not announce something publically. You post your own IRC conversation that you intend not to be public :)

Tue Mar 04 23:05:53 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   mircea_popescu, I've read more of your blogs. I'm curious about one thing. Do you have any investor relationships? (On your financial or exchange site, or whatever it is.) Meaning, do you have external investors of any kind?

Tue Mar 04 22:44:06 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   mircea_popescu, I've had private conversations that were just fine. It's true that you disagree with my approach and have clout here, you certainly set the tone in here, that's your right.

Tue Mar 04 22:43:28 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   mircea_popescu, well, this does not match my impression of conversations off of this channel. You seem to be the only one with a very strong view. I would humbly submit that it is due to your strong interest in one particular financial model. Of course if you start swearing at me people will dislike me.

Tue Mar 04 22:41:23 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   BingoBoingo - trust models can't be programmatic, or they will be games. For example someone will set up $10K just to spend on interest as they do hundreds of transactions with trusted members over a year - the only goal being to be given a $200K transaction that they then walk off with. You can't build trust programmatically.

Tue Mar 04 22:41:21 UTC 2014  <BingoBoingo>   ninjashogun: People don't have a "WoT score" they have personalize networks. The score is the least relevant part of a WoT

Tue Mar 04 22:40:21 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   BingoBoingo - if you trusted a stranger based on a WoT score and resolved a deal in a few minutes, you're very likely going to be scammed one day. It takes far longer than a few minutes to verify someone's identity that you've never met.

Tue Mar 04 22:39:06 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   yeah mircea_popescu, I just heard of an exchange that might have just walked off with millions in deposits, because rather than rely on real world contracts to protect creditors (people who deposit) it just built an online trust model.

Tue Mar 04 22:38:35 UTC 2014  <BingoBoingo>   ninjashogun: Well just this afternoon someone supposed a deal, I took and and the thing was resolved in minutes.

Tue Mar 04 22:38:20 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   nubbins`, why is it a benefit for you that that even exists? (For cases where there is a real world identity behind both sides)

Tue Mar 04 22:37:57 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   nubbins` Okay I'll bite. For people with real-world assets and paperwork, what on Earth benefit does ANYONE here get out of a robust WoT system existing?

Tue Mar 04 22:36:54 UTC 2014  <nubbins`>   ninjashogun: consider that you might as well be walking into banks asking for a loan and providing your WoT identity

Tue Mar 04 22:34:41 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   I don't need 'any size loan' and we could look at the budget breakdown together as well - I would expect it to be based on real world identities and paperwork, not IRC.

Tue Mar 04 22:34:40 UTC 2014  <nubbins`>   ninjashogun: don't worry about it, i was kidding anyway. go fuck yourself

Tue Mar 04 22:34:18 UTC 2014  <ninjashogun>   sorry, nubbins`, just read the backlog now. I was chatting with a couple of people sorry.

Tue Mar 04 22:17:56 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   "Feb 25 08:13:06 <ninjashogun> guys I've received some suggestions to "lurk" and "read logs" here, which I wouldn't really have time to do. It was nice meeting you all though and I may be back as the project progresses. Overall I don't think I will be spending a ton of time building WoT, advisors, etc - as I have real-world references for the moment that I would expect anyone to consutl."

« Previous Page    Next Page »