home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for nubbins, 45317 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Mon Mar 07 23:03:16 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   and generally royally fucking up

Mon Mar 07 23:03:08 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   which by that time he'd been accused of thieving 17 btc

Mon Mar 07 23:02:51 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   i also flatly disbelieve that mp sent A2, A..n to completely different nodes, because it's extremely, extremely relevant and didn't come out until his original argument shit the bed

Mon Mar 07 23:01:25 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   guffaw

Mon Mar 07 23:01:18 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   and restate on irc once more

Mon Mar 07 23:01:15 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   you must then write a blog post

Mon Mar 07 23:01:12 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   stating an argument once is insufficient

Mon Mar 07 23:01:06 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   "feel free to restate"

Mon Mar 07 23:00:13 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   because two entities control most of the mining, and it's absolutely retarded for those same entities to not have a similar amount of control over nodes?

Mon Mar 07 23:00:02 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   nubbins`: they are, however, my strong point. and mircea_popescu asked an entirely logical q.

Mon Mar 07 22:58:55 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   numbers aren't your strong suit, maybe stick to doing the dark andreas antonolololopous schtick, it's what you're good at

Mon Mar 07 22:58:48 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   nubbins`: what he was asking is, why would the nodes that he did NOT transmit a1 to, reject a2.

Mon Mar 07 22:58:26 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   nice try tho

Mon Mar 07 22:58:24 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   suppose i run two nodes, one a member of Nk and one a member of Nm. As long as my nodes are running proper sanity checks on each other (i.e. passing tx's between them), which obviously they should be because i'm not running SPV nodes, mp's "mathematical" argument falls apart at the seams

Mon Mar 07 22:55:49 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   and call shame upon mp

Mon Mar 07 22:55:41 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   i guffaw loudly at the continued refusal to discuss 17 btc bitbet fraud

Mon Mar 07 22:55:24 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   asciilifeform he spent all afternoon "napping" by throwing together some maths and deciding to switch stories

Mon Mar 07 22:54:10 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=07-03-2016#1425743 mnope.

Mon Mar 07 22:53:38 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   <+mircea_popescu> asciilifeform i seem to recall he failed both tests for continued lordship and was basically not on the list of names to be cleared because he asked not to be. << memory failing you once again

Mon Mar 07 22:51:45 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   ;)

« Previous Page    Next Page »