Matches for nubbins, 45317 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 07 16:52:40 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> B was mysterymeat input
Mon Mar 07 16:52:18 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> don't make me dig up examples of bets that took a week to resolve
Mon Mar 07 16:52:13 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> nubbins`: i thought your objection was precisely to a4
Mon Mar 07 16:52:05 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> it's not like prompt payouts have ever been a priority
Mon Mar 07 16:51:52 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> or, y'know, fucking waited
Mon Mar 07 16:51:45 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> if he'd gone straight from A1 to A4 we'd probably all be drinking soda together now
Mon Mar 07 16:51:25 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> unsusprisingly, nothing happened
Mon Mar 07 16:51:21 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> yes, he did
Mon Mar 07 16:51:19 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> while the backlog is still huge.
Mon Mar 07 16:51:11 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> with the same inputs.
Mon Mar 07 16:51:06 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> or send another turbo low fee transaction 12 hours later.
Mon Mar 07 16:50:29 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> asciilifeform well then!
Mon Mar 07 16:50:24 UTC 2016 <adlai> nubbins`: couldn't the inputs of B have been from other bets? maybe not how "bettors have come to expect" payouts would work, but not strictly speaking funds which don't belong to s.bbet
Mon Mar 07 16:50:19 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> asciilifeform if i send $7,000 cash in the mail, i don't let the post office choose the delivery standard
Mon Mar 07 16:50:07 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> nubbins`: this is not true, see the onetimepad thread, mp admitted that he made an arithmetical mistake once !
Mon Mar 07 16:49:51 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> the hilarity that's ensued today is me proving this to the point of ridiculousness
Mon Mar 07 16:49:38 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> mp does not address concerns, flaws, mistakes, or errors. ever.
Mon Mar 07 16:49:29 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> PeterL i don't think you understand how this place works
Mon Mar 07 16:48:55 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> nubbins`: my current hypothesis is that he did not intend a reactor test, but simply allowed the transmitter to calculate a default fee, which turned out to be 0, and sent.
Mon Mar 07 16:48:49 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> PeterL i think it's fairly obvious that customer payouts are zero priority, given the 0-fee payout attempt followed by a payout embargo