Matches for nubbins, 45317 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 07 15:01:04 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> trinque agreed. mp's ludicrously false statements set the bar really low
Mon Mar 07 14:58:12 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> and is so hotly ashamed that he's resorted to this
Mon Mar 07 14:57:22 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> i actually think it's beyond mirthful that mp lost 17 btc of bitbet's money
Mon Mar 07 14:56:53 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> idgaf about some 17btc transaction, only to point out that if someone touts targeted collusion as the most likely answer, they're probably selling something
Mon Mar 07 14:55:29 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> i should just state the obvious explanation and let whoever wants to sing about cartel collusion do so
Mon Mar 07 14:55:11 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> no, i really shouldn't
Mon Mar 07 14:54:17 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> nubbins`, you should write it up for the sake of changing the minds of people who are so far not impressed with your unsubstantiated claims in the channel
Mon Mar 07 14:51:47 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> a dime. actually nine american cents at the time of the incident.
Mon Mar 07 14:50:49 UTC 2016 <*> nubbins` has never, ever, ever had a stuck tx and is baffled as to why anyone w/ money ever would
Mon Mar 07 14:50:28 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron why in the fuck would i do that? i'm not so cheap that i can't afford a dime for fees
Mon Mar 07 14:50:11 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> given that miners who run node farms aren't fucking idiots, it seems implausible to assume that halting rebroadcast of lowest-priority tx's until the backlog is cleared is not a thing that would happen
Mon Mar 07 14:48:45 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> given that it's trivial to create a large backlog of old coins, it seems implausible to think that mp's relatively new coins could not simultaneously be high enough priority to be kept in mempool but low enough priority that it's one of the last tx's to be cleared
Mon Mar 07 14:47:16 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> given that any rational miner would save old coins, it seems implausible to think that a small number of miners would be unable to create a huge mempool backlog
Mon Mar 07 14:46:45 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> given that age is a factor in propagating tx's, it seems implausibly short-sighted to assume that miners don't keep a portion of their earnings untouched to build up age
Mon Mar 07 14:45:20 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> why do extra work when the timer's counting down? adding a single extra output could mean the difference between mining a block and not
Mon Mar 07 14:44:44 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> davout +1
Mon Mar 07 14:44:23 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> ;;echo enjoy following the convo
Mon Mar 07 14:44:17 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> ;;echo sounds like you thought this whole ignore thing through about as much as you thought through your cartel conspiracy
Mon Mar 07 14:43:35 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> this doesn't preclude the fact that /any/ individual pool miner can have 10%, or 50%, or 100% of his daily take socked away immediately into long-term storage
Mon Mar 07 14:43:05 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> because it's retarded to chop up a reward before you have to