Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Fri Jun 26 17:23:34 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> thinking that mod6 will roll them up into a 'static fix' patch
Fri Jun 26 17:22:18 UTC 2015 <mod6> (11:31) <+mod6> asciilifeform: I just did the following: extracted v0.5.3.1-RELEASE applied the following patches successfully { dnsseed_snipsnip, kills-integer-retardation, nubs-gentoo-sanity, orphange-thermonuke, orphange-tx-amputation, dns-thermonyukyoolar } but when I added the patch for IRC demo, got the following error:
Fri Jun 26 17:22:01 UTC 2015 <mod6> ascii_field: oh, i did have an issue patching in that last IRC demo patch.... im gonna try it again, but it complained about net.cpp:ThreadGetMyExternalIP
Fri Jun 26 15:31:22 UTC 2015 <mod6> asciilifeform: I just did the following: extracted v0.5.3.1-RELEASE applied the following patches successfully { dnsseed_snipsnip, kills-integer-retardation, nubs-gentoo-sanity, orphange-thermonuke, orphange-tx-amputation, dns-thermonyukyoolar } but when I added the patch for IRC demo, got the following error:
Fri Jun 26 15:27:30 UTC 2015 <mod6> But anyone is welcome to patch on their own.
Fri Jun 26 15:16:58 UTC 2015 <mod6> i've tried like 3 different versions of gcc, with and without my special gcc patch shoehorned in, 2 different versions of uclibc. not quite sure what to think yet.
Thu Jun 25 19:15:41 UTC 2015 <mod6> if we do anything else other than 5.4, that'd probably be good cause otherwise we'll hvae to patch your patch. :]
Thu Jun 25 19:14:59 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> i'll sign an identical patch sans the bump if anyone needs this.
Thu Jun 25 19:14:20 UTC 2015 <mod6> yeah, as far as the version number, in hindsight; going forward, we should probably keep all version bumps in it's own patch incase something changes. i.e. your latest IRC Full Demolition Patch.
Thu Jun 25 04:30:06 UTC 2015 <decimation> ah I see, was looking at earlier patch
Thu Jun 25 04:21:41 UTC 2015 <decimation> phf: I made a patch to note from which node each block comes
Thu Jun 25 04:20:57 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> phf: somewhere we have an anti-debug.log-rollover patch
Thu Jun 25 04:20:15 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> phf: if you generated this with a custom patch for the beast itself, please share this
Wed Jun 24 19:06:51 UTC 2015 <mod6> So anyway, we'll have to remember this when we revist the Checkpoints issue. My patch will be rejected then, and we'll come up with something that gets rid of line 939 as well as pulling the checkpoints themselves out of checkpoints.cpp and into a separate config file.
Wed Jun 24 18:52:21 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> and was forgotten when bdb locks patch discovered
Wed Jun 24 18:31:57 UTC 2015 <mod6> ascii_field: re: checkpoints: the patch worked fine to remove checkpoints, but it was tabled for the time being. the main discussion around this was that it could be helpful to hvae checkpoints in there to prevent spamming of blocks from timestamps before a checkpoint.
Wed Jun 24 18:15:30 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> ben_vulpes, mod6, mircea_popescu, et al: can anyone recall why http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/attachments/20141218/bitcoin-v0_5_3-rm_checkpoints_41327b9a962e6d27869f4d361d742ab5c7061ede.5.patch didn't make it in ?
Wed Jun 24 01:40:26 UTC 2015 <mod6> if I add a simple patch file for the -fPIC to /etc/portage/patches/sys-lib/<patchfile> and then emerge uclibc, then it builds, but the outcome is the same of the bitcoind compilation
Wed Jun 24 01:39:20 UTC 2015 <mod6> well, so here's the deal. I can't get it to compile "by hand". meaning, that if i extract the 2 bzip'd files for uclibc: uClibc-0.9.33.2.tar.bz2 & uClibc-0.9.33.2-patches.tar.bz2 and then patch the former with the latter with something like this: for i in `ls ../patch/*.patch | sort` ; do patch -p1 < ../patch/$i ; done
Wed Jun 24 00:36:36 UTC 2015 <trinque> mod6: could patch the Makefile using that patches mechanism