home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Fri May 01 17:47:53 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   same "they're moving up and down on a patch of land ; we're moving up and down on a patch of land. what the hell's the difference!"

Fri May 01 17:11:20 UTC 2015  <ascii_field>   *patch

Wed Apr 29 16:33:56 UTC 2015  <mod6>   <+ascii_field> the patch, note, did not remove all (there is a 'what is my ip' thing in there ) << ah, i recall. ok and this is what initiated the conversation about SHA256 addy's as opposd to dotted quads right?

Wed Apr 29 16:31:53 UTC 2015  <mod6>   we were on track at that point to try to cut a milestone. but just about that time is when we hit the tx validation problem in 168`000 ; I think your patch just got lost in the shuffle.

Wed Apr 29 16:29:30 UTC 2015  <ascii_field>   the patch, note, did not remove all (there is a 'what is my ip' thing in there )

Wed Apr 29 16:29:09 UTC 2015  <mod6>   is that releated to his patch that removes the dns stuff?

Wed Apr 29 13:25:03 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   friend, and the last thing I see before I black out is a patch of yellow cheese powder inside her long tangled beard."

Tue Apr 28 23:56:36 UTC 2015  <trinque>   patches of whatever size make sense, and there's a process by which everyone else can call the patch shit in public

Tue Apr 28 23:55:59 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   i doubt the magical patch that fixes the 1001 things will fit in 100kb for instance.

Tue Apr 28 23:55:17 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   ascii_field: trinque: and if any of you produce a 100kB patch, and i barf on general principle << there is a problem here. the code as it is is pretty long. just a simple "remove most of it" will be in the kbs.

Tue Apr 28 23:30:02 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 28-04-2015 20:04:04; Adlai: so, it's less convenient for signing a patch relative to an upstream repo; but is exactly what you want if you just want to have a single head to put on a stake when heardbleed 2.0 gets uncovered

Tue Apr 28 22:25:18 UTC 2015  <Adlai>   ok, you sign some other dude's patch. same diff

Tue Apr 28 22:24:56 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   it wasn't going to be a patch

Tue Apr 28 21:41:05 UTC 2015  <jurov>   haven't i wrote somewhere that every productive day ends with patch or bugreport?

Tue Apr 28 20:49:12 UTC 2015  <trinque>   seems like an ID of a patch would obviously be some hash of it

Tue Apr 28 20:35:29 UTC 2015  <ascii_field>   trinque: and if any of you produce a 100kB patch, and i barf on general principle and refuse to have anything more to do with project, don't say i didn't warn that vcs is harmful.

Tue Apr 28 20:33:39 UTC 2015  <trinque>   git solves this problem, and I can even email you a patch directly out of git

Tue Apr 28 20:31:30 UTC 2015  <trinque>   doesn't make me feel smart to pluck a patch from an email attachment

Tue Apr 28 20:26:41 UTC 2015  <ascii_field>   so long as the output is a unix patch

Tue Apr 28 20:21:56 UTC 2015  <Adlai>   note that darcs does NOTHING beyond 'patch -p1 < thingy'

« Previous Page    Next Page »