Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Dec 03 03:06:04 UTC 2014 <assbot> Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » Chaos Patch (#38) ... ( http://bit.ly/1FLantI )
Tue Dec 02 03:33:25 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> Still, do you really want some insurer or landlord knowing how much spackle you had to buy to patch the walls after the bacanals
Tue Dec 02 02:26:30 UTC 2014 <assbot> f9beb4d9 #17: SUCCESS (stable); Comment: asciilifeform's goodbye-win-32 patch
Tue Dec 02 02:26:28 UTC 2014 <assbot> f9beb4d9 #16: SUCCESS (stable); Comment: asciilifeform's turdmeister-alert-snip patch
Tue Dec 02 02:26:24 UTC 2014 <assbot> f9beb4d9 #13: SUCCESS (stable); Comment: asciilifeform's https-snipsnip patch
Tue Dec 02 02:26:22 UTC 2014 <assbot> f9beb4d9 #12: SUCCESS (stable); Comment: ben vulpes' rm_rf_upnp patch
Tue Dec 02 02:26:12 UTC 2014 <assbot> f9beb4d9 #5: FAILURE (broken since build #3); Comment: initial commit: asciilifeform's manifest and rm's manifest and 'chicken' patch
Tue Dec 02 02:26:10 UTC 2014 <assbot> f9beb4d9 #4: FAILURE (broken since build #3); Comment: result of applying the chicken patch
Tue Dec 02 00:17:25 UTC 2014 <assbot> Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » Chaos Patch (#38) ... ( http://bit.ly/1HT47Uk )
Sun Nov 30 23:56:38 UTC 2014 <jurov> ben_vulpes: yes. i'll look why it did not associate patch with signature
Sun Nov 30 22:59:09 UTC 2014 <kakobrekla> these lisp guys ... 'nobody submited a patch in 4 and a half minuts...!' and 'only one download first day' is 'project dead dood'
Sat Nov 29 20:24:59 UTC 2014 <assbot> LKML: Greg Kroah-Hartman: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation ... ( http://bit.ly/15KTnca )
Sat Nov 29 20:11:00 UTC 2014 <assbot> Re: [PATCH 00/12] Add kdbus implementation [LWN.net] ... ( http://bit.ly/15KSro8 )
Tue Nov 25 19:29:50 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> 'Of course, this already happened: someone wrote a patch... in 2011... That said, the patch was rejected, and that's that. The bug lives on.'
Sun Nov 23 05:04:07 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> just like there's no punishment for the anon derp hiding behind "contributed a patch to openssh"
Sat Nov 22 04:37:29 UTC 2014 <decimation> they might even find a particular patch of jungle that is more pleasing than another
Fri Nov 21 22:04:19 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> 5) patch is reversed by folks paid or otherwise happy to carry out this duty, and go to step 2.
Fri Nov 21 22:03:46 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> 4) exploit is patched, patch introduces more of the substance seen in step (1) (plausibly-deniable spaghetti that contains seeds of next iteration of cycle)
Sat Nov 15 01:25:23 UTC 2014 <ben_vulpes> but if you're going to hack on it, start with the 0.5.3 dist at f9beb4d9.org, apply asciilifeform's "chicken" patch, and then yours on top of that.
Sat Nov 15 00:35:35 UTC 2014 <Adlai> of course, but the "manual trust verification" approach taken further would suggest only applying critical bugfixes, as patches, signed by the developer who wrote them (preferably with a signature published at the time of the fix, alternatively obtaining a signature in the present day... or manually verifying the patch's trustworthyness, and signing yourself)