Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sat Nov 15 00:34:02 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> but i will not be signing any patch that i can't apply with my mind, in my mental model of the code.
Sat Nov 15 00:19:44 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> undata: well, to the extent that any version control system can be cudgelled into coughing up output compatible with 'patch' - then yes.
Sat Nov 15 00:12:47 UTC 2014 <Adlai> a "conflict" would require a separate patch, which should be signed by the resolver
Sat Nov 15 00:12:47 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> Adlai: we have the metadata. the integer in the patch fileames.
Sat Nov 15 00:10:32 UTC 2014 <Adlai> asciilifeform: you can add metadata such as patch dependency which is not evident just from the patch's raw contents
Sat Nov 15 00:10:12 UTC 2014 <Adlai> they're looking for verified patch lists
Sat Nov 15 00:10:09 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> Adlai: in what way is 'darcs' output more useful than unix patch?
Fri Nov 14 01:10:54 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> also i don't remember if i reminded anyone of this, but unix 'patch' utility is rather braindead.
Fri Nov 14 01:10:22 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> so what will be the convention for submitting 'patch note with sig' ?
Fri Nov 14 01:08:57 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> jurov seems the site needs the extension of a "patch notes" clickable field ?
Fri Nov 14 01:07:46 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> 1 change per patch.
Fri Nov 14 01:05:44 UTC 2014 <jurov> maybe you want to rate the patch? lol
Fri Nov 14 01:02:47 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> that a patch, a particular one, is a particular identifiable 'thing.'
Fri Nov 14 01:00:18 UTC 2014 <jurov> it pairs the sig to the patch by name
Fri Nov 14 01:00:10 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> so basically, the correct approach here would have been for ascii to make a patch for each individual diff ?
Fri Nov 14 00:58:23 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> jurov: how would he (or anyone else) submit a detached sig meant to go with a particular patch ?
Fri Nov 14 00:57:21 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> someone (who read it!) try signing my patch ?
Fri Nov 14 00:55:34 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> jurov: i got yet another copy of 'patch' in email. i presume you are turning the knobs as we speak?
Fri Nov 14 00:50:52 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> (one could hypothetically have a patch 'submitted by' mr x but 'signed by' mr y
Fri Nov 14 00:50:24 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> i'd suggest showing original patch author's sig also