Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sun Oct 26 22:20:38 UTC 2014 <jurov> i they approve the patch
Sun Oct 26 22:20:17 UTC 2014 <jurov> author sends email with attached patch and signature as similarly-named attachments
Sun Oct 26 22:19:41 UTC 2014 <jurov> mircea_popescu: other people's signatures will be detached from definition... or do you want to include the patch everywhere?
Sun Oct 26 21:42:49 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform: ideally, we'd have a patch and a collection of detached sigs of the plain ascii of the patch <<< detached sigs are in fact a reimplementation of the old punch cards
Sun Oct 26 21:09:40 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> satoshi << hilarious gedankenexperiment! if a patch shows up signed with his key, is it to be considered?
Sun Oct 26 21:02:21 UTC 2014 <jurov> btw if other people will sign a concrete patch, that prevents later diddling anyway
Sun Oct 26 21:01:30 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> at any rate, it seems like we're on the path to a 'patch-chain' - so no chance of authorship being permanently obscured, unless everyone somehow manages to lose his backup
Sun Oct 26 20:55:00 UTC 2014 <ben_vulpes> should anyone *want* to endeedify their patch, they're welcome to.
Sun Oct 26 20:48:59 UTC 2014 <jurov> asciilifeform: how? generate a deed for every patch?
Sun Oct 26 16:37:39 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> kakobrekla: the author of the exe diddler was dumb enough to be spotted, too (why patch all exes, and not look for the download to be part of a realistic luser browser session? retarded)
Sun Oct 26 16:24:41 UTC 2014 <kakobrekla> tor will patch your binaries.
Sun Oct 26 08:05:16 UTC 2014 <assbot> Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » Chaos Patch (#33)
Sun Oct 26 00:56:09 UTC 2014 <mod6> and more-over, all the steps/requirements involved in creating such a patch.
Sun Oct 26 00:53:25 UTC 2014 <mod6> can someone take the time to create a document outlining how to submit a patch to said forthcoming mailing list?
Sat Oct 25 22:59:22 UTC 2014 <ben_vulpes> i'd like to have a thing that built a patch; booted the resulting artifact on testnet, mined some TN coins, sent them to itself, etc
Sat Oct 25 22:30:22 UTC 2014 <jurov> Yes. then the patch above can be used: "A post will be distributed only if the PGP signature on the post is from one of the list members."
Sat Oct 25 22:28:46 UTC 2014 <jurov> and whoever want to sign it, sends patch-author-id.sig too
Sat Oct 25 22:28:08 UTC 2014 <jurov> thus ... for every attachment named patch-author-id attach also patch-author-id.sig
Sat Oct 25 22:27:52 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> mail message with - body, sig of body, attachment1 (patch), attachment2 (sig of patch) ?
Sat Oct 25 22:27:18 UTC 2014 <jurov> as long as each patch can be uniquely identified and paired with relevant sigs