Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Fri Oct 24 19:21:12 UTC 2014 <bounce> asciilifeform: by the by, you familiar with "patch -u"? though there's really no shortcut for "delete this file", you still get to see the whole of what is being deleted even if it is the entire file.
Fri Oct 24 16:27:23 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> unrelated - is the standard unix 'patch' util braindamaged, or am i? specifically, the ludicrously elephantine output when deleting files
Fri Oct 24 03:11:40 UTC 2014 <decimation> I might contribute a patch or two if the ball is rolling
Fri Oct 24 02:33:59 UTC 2014 <kakobrekla> speaking of assbot, just pushed a patch and going for reset
Fri Oct 24 01:38:56 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> BingoBoingo well honestly, back around .3.x the atmosphere was quite different. i dunno who or why would not patch when satoshi said patch.
Fri Oct 24 01:33:04 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> and apparently it is possible to get 'git' to cough up a plain unix patch.
Thu Oct 23 21:48:02 UTC 2014 <assbot> LKML: Greg KH: Re: [PATCH] usb: serial: Perform verification for FTDI FT232R devices
Thu Oct 23 20:07:37 UTC 2014 <*> kakobrekla wont run bitcoind without the 'coin control' patch
Thu Oct 23 19:55:13 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> and often, sc4mz0rz patch into the reader, and plant bug there
Thu Oct 23 04:51:08 UTC 2014 <undata> you can extract a nice looking patch from git, and even email it from there
Thu Oct 23 04:49:36 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> i was hoping to rationally convince people that the totality of the project ought to be the mailing list, the totality of the mailing list ought to consist of gpg-signed ascii text, and that this includes patch sets - which, collectively, add up to the product.
Thu Oct 23 04:41:53 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> sign (gpg, yes) a plain ascii patch set.
Thu Oct 23 00:33:01 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> patch to mailman << why ?
Thu Oct 23 00:32:46 UTC 2014 <jurov> with a patch to mailman?
Wed Oct 22 19:03:05 UTC 2014 <jurov> i vote for patch delivery via ICBMs
Wed Oct 22 18:52:16 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> <asciilifeform> how to do signed commits << the barbarian way. everyone who read a patch file (yes) and is willing to sign under it, signs. this gets posted. whoever wants, can apply the patches to get a merged turdball. << i think this is exactly how it should go.
Wed Oct 22 18:51:42 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> how to do signed commits << the barbarian way. everyone who read a patch file (yes) and is willing to sign under it, signs. this gets posted. whoever wants, can apply the patches to get a merged turdball.
Wed Oct 22 01:46:25 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> ;;later tell mircea_popescu care to share your 0.6 patch set for the paper codex?
Tue Oct 21 16:38:40 UTC 2014 <Adlai> it'd be a little funny if all the devs agreed to the hardfork, got a working patch together, then went miner by miner and couldn't get a single one to agree to switch
Sun Oct 19 03:08:15 UTC 2014 <decimation> lol https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/2/415 << the systemd people tried to get Linus to accept a patch where the 'debug' kernel command argument would be silently removed from userspace, because it would trigger systemd spamming errors so badly that it wouldn't boot the system