home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Sat Feb 13 02:08:48 UTC 2016  <ben_vulpes>   mircea_popescu: file hash alone does not specify which patch to which you pressed.

Sat Feb 13 02:04:27 UTC 2016  <mod6>   when he built it, it ~should~ have included your original malleus patch, see: ./v.pl p verbose rotor/TEST2 asciilifeform_malleus_mikehearnificarum.vpatch

Fri Feb 12 18:34:34 UTC 2016  <funkenstein_>   I would resubmit the privkeytools patch to ml, but I'm unsure where the rebase should go (in patch order) and - would rather await further tests from trinque and others, seeing as this touches live ammunition

Fri Feb 12 18:33:04 UTC 2016  <funkenstein_>   nice patch polarbeard!

Fri Feb 12 14:13:21 UTC 2016  <polarbeard>   works like a charm, here is a patch for removing some unused functions if somebody is interested: https://github.com/polarbeard/trb/blob/master/patches/polarbeard_rm_unused_functions.vpatch https://github.com/polarbeard/trb/blob/master/sigs/polarbeard_rm_unused_functions.vpatch.polarbeard.sig

Fri Feb 12 13:37:21 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   polarbeard: betcha you didn't apply part1 patch !

Thu Feb 11 00:59:26 UTC 2016  <gernika>   mod6 verified in v99995_beta2 that it no longer presses a non-existent patch name and throws an error instead.

Tue Feb 09 16:37:55 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   without db locks patch at the least

Tue Feb 09 16:06:53 UTC 2016  <assbot>   Logged on 09-02-2016 15:16:19; ben_vulpes: press a patch without hashes in the headers

Tue Feb 09 16:02:24 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   e.g., i can submit a patch which depends only on genesis, and it will be among the current leaves

Tue Feb 09 15:59:07 UTC 2016  <assbot>   Logged on 09-02-2016 14:57:13; mircea_popescu: PeterL> or am I totally confused? << a patch can only be safely applied to its antecedent. two patches at the same level CAN NOT be both applied by definition.

Tue Feb 09 15:34:30 UTC 2016  <mod6>   ben_vulpes: here's a peek at the squshed beta 1 & beta 2 vpatches - unless something changes between now and tonight, i'll be sending this one to the ML. All you need to do to apply is get V [v99996], copy `v.pl' to `v.pl.v99996`, then place this patch in the same dir and do: `patch -p0 < V_v99995_beta2.vpatch` and give it a go

Tue Feb 09 15:32:36 UTC 2016  <assbot>   Successfully added a rating of 2 for phf with note: provided example CL code for next deedbot, made excellent v-patch viewer, intelligent fellow

Tue Feb 09 15:31:52 UTC 2016  <trinque>   !rate phf 2 provided example CL code for next deedbot, made excellent v-patch viewer, intelligent fellow

Tue Feb 09 15:26:15 UTC 2016  <mod6>   shipping? it'll just be a whole bundle once we do a bit of testing -- but tonights patch will be a squashed patch of the one from last week, and the additional changes here.

Tue Feb 09 15:25:24 UTC 2016  <ben_vulpes>   mod6: what kind of patch are you shipping? ri patch or v patch?

Tue Feb 09 15:24:48 UTC 2016  <mod6>   if/when you can get the new patch applied, give it a try and let me know. thx.

Tue Feb 09 15:24:22 UTC 2016  <mod6>   <+ben_vulpes> press a patch without hashes in the headers << i've actually got that one covered in the patch im about to put out there tonight.

Tue Feb 09 15:16:19 UTC 2016  <ben_vulpes>   press a patch without hashes in the headers

Tue Feb 09 15:01:03 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   you necessarily and always specify the order when you write the patch, because it includes the hash of the thing you want it applied on top of.

« Previous Page    Next Page »