Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Feb 02 23:31:29 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> ascii_butugychag> my intent was that the user would include ALL of the leaves he is interested in by using a custom patch dir, and then press to the last. << this is not a bad approach (for dev work). i wouldn't want it in the press-for-deploy, but different story.
Tue Feb 02 22:23:44 UTC 2016 <mod6> ok, well, we can worry about that later when we write our own patch-o-matic
Tue Feb 02 22:07:28 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> the result of a 'patch' ever not matching the hash, SHOULD NOT HAPPEN
Tue Feb 02 22:05:22 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> mod6: i recommend for it to also run patch with F 0
Tue Feb 02 22:04:26 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> my intent was that the user would include ALL of the leaves he is interested in by using a custom patch dir, and then press to the last.
Tue Feb 02 21:59:14 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> mod6: patch .... -F 0 ...
Tue Feb 02 21:56:23 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> PeterL: my original vtron was controlled by manually selecting patch sets
Tue Feb 02 21:48:47 UTC 2016 <polarbeard> I'm aliasing potch='patch --fuzzy 1000'
Tue Feb 02 21:47:41 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> in fact, the use of gnudiff/patch is really happenstance
Tue Feb 02 21:46:03 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> 'this patch applies IF THIS HASH otherwise FUCKOFF'
Tue Feb 02 21:43:39 UTC 2016 <polarbeard> lol, committed by patch
Tue Feb 02 21:42:58 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> jesus i wonder how much "mission critical code" was really written by patch itself.
Tue Feb 02 21:42:35 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> tries to make the patch fit
Tue Feb 02 21:42:27 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> it is 'patch' that does this
Tue Feb 02 21:12:26 UTC 2016 <mod6> before i re-grind this patch, im gonna look into V a bit while I wait for ascii to give me the green light on the other two reground from lastnight.
Tue Feb 02 21:10:27 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> but not the return code of patch -p0 < .... ?
Tue Feb 02 21:09:55 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> i thought mod6's vtron actually verified each patch operation ?
Tue Feb 02 21:05:25 UTC 2016 <jurov> is that always decidable? if i have A, which has a child patch B, and author regrinds A into A' which is to be kept?
Tue Feb 02 21:03:48 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> an obsolete patch is simply one that doesn't keep getting built on.
Tue Feb 02 21:02:00 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> a, e.g., shiva.cpp - only patch - will work fine