home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Tue Feb 02 21:01:50 UTC 2016  <ascii_butugychag>   ty mod6. i'd like to note that in a time of 'fog of war', when some patch is up in the air, it is not necessary to hold off on ~all~ work, but only things which concern the affected subsystems.

Tue Feb 02 21:00:24 UTC 2016  <mod6>   if anyone else is in the middle of creating a patch - maybe hold off a day or so before you submit until I can straighten out the tree & test everything.

Tue Feb 02 20:59:32 UTC 2016  <mod6>   looks like it compiled fine -- even though the patch had to apply with Hunk offset garbage

Tue Feb 02 20:59:03 UTC 2016  <polarbeard>   mod6: you mean on my patch?

Tue Feb 02 20:58:22 UTC 2016  <mod6>   whats weird here, is that the hashes in the patch, before and after, match nothing that i've got. so i've gotta figure that out.

Tue Feb 02 20:56:52 UTC 2016  <polarbeard>   ben_vulpes, mircea_popescu: hey thanks for reviewing and submitting my patch

Tue Feb 02 20:53:13 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   anyway, im not doing a patch. im doing v.pl

Tue Feb 02 20:52:41 UTC 2016  <mod6>   something is wrong with that patch, and V isn't doing anything about it.

Tue Feb 02 20:30:09 UTC 2016  <ascii_butugychag>   this is how a patch ought to be.

Tue Feb 02 20:25:22 UTC 2016  <ascii_butugychag>   btw which main.cpp does this patch sit on ?

Tue Feb 02 17:34:47 UTC 2016  <ascii_butugychag>   this, if you will, is a 'bridge' meta-patch.

Tue Feb 02 15:41:14 UTC 2016  <ascii_butugychag>   how about !patch PATCH.vpatch SIG.somebody.sig

Tue Feb 02 15:37:58 UTC 2016  <assbot>   Logged on 02-02-2016 14:14:45; mircea_popescu: trinque so not with the intent to pressure you, but : is deedbot patch insertion likely to come online soon or should i re-learn how to do it via email ?

Tue Feb 02 15:07:40 UTC 2016  <phf>   polarbeard: PeterL: a getpeerinfo backport patch for trb: https://gist.github.com/polarbeard/db7909cba265c3c50c02 << http://btcbase.org/patches/polarbeard_add_getpeerinfo_rpc

Tue Feb 02 14:14:45 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   trinque so not with the intent to pressure you, but : is deedbot patch insertion likely to come online soon or should i re-learn how to do it via email ?

Tue Feb 02 10:05:28 UTC 2016  <polarbeard>   PeterL: a getpeerinfo backport patch for trb: https://gist.github.com/polarbeard/db7909cba265c3c50c02

Tue Feb 02 05:08:04 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   as annoying as b c etc might be they're mostly minor and could be fixed by a further patch. a however is a killer, and colors both b and c in similar tones, because it betrays the fundamental problem with this patch : it doesn't flow from a structured approach given in depth consideration, but merely from your desire to help and impressive stamina.

Tue Feb 02 02:14:58 UTC 2016  <jurov>   i just happened to stumble upon it cuz vulpes' test data has only one - alf's signature per patch

Tue Feb 02 02:09:30 UTC 2016  <mod6>   in the case of v, if she had created a patch, and she was the only one who signed it and her key expired tomorrow, well, someone better grok it and sign it who's in the current lordship

Mon Feb 01 19:46:01 UTC 2016  <trinque>   trb node is at 384k; I will be switching to that with anti-heathen command patch very soon

« Previous Page    Next Page »