Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sun Sep 27 03:18:29 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> ben_vulpes: to be clear - I've "banged together" nothing, unless you want to count a patch allowing one to use truetype fonts. The majority of my work is assembling obtuse packages for noobz with justification as to *why* certain decision were made.
Sat Sep 26 00:59:18 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> (i.e. one that would patch the client to immediately emit whole wallet in one fat tx to $addr upon any decryption)
Fri Sep 25 02:04:35 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> no, just make a special patch (for historical reasons called a manifest) that does exactly what you describe
Fri Sep 25 02:02:59 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> ;;later tell mod6 after this, anyone who wants to build THAT release merely needs to 'grab' ~that~ patch and 'v' does the rest.
Fri Sep 25 02:02:15 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> ;;later tell mod6 http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=25-09-2015#1285169 << the way i suggested doing it is to avoid having multiple classes of signed objects. manifest for a release would be merely another kind of patch - one that simply takes every leaf that is to form part of the release head, and add a comment to the top of the file, 'REL-xxx.' this auto-gloms the leaves into a single patch 'handle', think about it.
Fri Sep 25 01:19:52 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 24-09-2015 21:54:55; phf: well, the patch gives special status to ips that were explicitly provided. if you're being mitm'd, your only recourse is operator intervention, the goal of the patch was to ensure that your recourse does not automatically become "use random shmoe"
Thu Sep 24 22:03:22 UTC 2015 <gernika> wedged - due to not having the patch yes
Thu Sep 24 22:03:16 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> as in, didn't have the bdb locks fix patch applied ?
Thu Sep 24 21:54:55 UTC 2015 <phf> well, the patch gives special status to ips that were explicitly provided. if you're being mitm'd, your only recourse is operator intervention, the goal of the patch was to ensure that your recourse does not automatically become "use random shmoe"
Thu Sep 24 21:43:57 UTC 2015 <phf> -connect based nodes in large avoid this problems because there's a mainloop that keeps adding same -connect supplied addresses over and over again, so even if elsewhere it's decided to drop the node, it'll be added and reconnected again on the next iteration. never the less a connect node can still be banned for misbehaving, which is something that his patch prevents from happening
Thu Sep 24 21:29:38 UTC 2015 <phf> to misbehave, idle however long and send data as large as they want. what's not implemented: prioritizing trusted nodes over others during node selection: you might still lose connection by natural means, in which case -addnode nodes will be dropped, and a standard node selection mechanism is used. the patch so far is here http://paste.lisp.org/display/155710. i'm thinking that ultimate vs. trusted distinction might be unnecessary. i would
Thu Sep 24 00:25:20 UTC 2015 <mod6> <+phf> shinohai: you probably have rm_gitignore.patch applied, which removes .gitignore files from src/obj/nogui and nukes the folders along the way? << i said to disregard this patch. reason is, it wipes out output dirs required by the bitcoin makefile.
Wed Sep 23 17:05:30 UTC 2015 <phf> i think there was a conversation at some point how diff/patch doesn't create empty directories and you have to resort to .keepme hacks, it was suggested that the correct solution is to patch makefile.unix instead, but i don't think that was done
Thu Sep 17 08:14:55 UTC 2015 <punkman> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=17-09-2015#1277426 << we might need a rule to not do that without the patch also touching an existing file
Thu Sep 17 02:36:29 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> all that remains is to bolt a patch-eater onto it and then the classical turdatron can enjoy a quiet retirement
Wed Sep 16 13:58:02 UTC 2015 <mod6> <+punkman> maybe it could appear when you mouse over an edge, the files a patch "inherits" from a previous patch << exactly this
Wed Sep 16 13:57:34 UTC 2015 <punkman> maybe it could appear when you mouse over an edge, the files a patch "inherits" from a previous patch
Wed Sep 16 03:40:04 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu, hanbot, anyone else manually working through the patch history, don't miss http://thebitcoin.foundation/misc/vpatch-nodes.html
Tue Sep 15 19:57:45 UTC 2015 <mod6> <+ascii_field> see if you can make the patch names clickable links << i'll see what I can do. thx.
Tue Sep 15 19:57:20 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> see if you can make the patch names clickable links