Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Aug 19 00:41:43 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> ;;later tell BingoBoingo if you write a patch for the verson string thing, i'll read it!
Tue Aug 18 21:20:39 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=18-08-2015#1242106 << prolly a great thing to fix huh. << In practice largely supplanted by the patch on therealbitcoin list
Sun Aug 16 02:22:09 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 16-08-2015 00:54:40; hanbot: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com//?date=11-08-2015#1235149 << for the record i bungled this, built a (seemingly working nevertheless) frankenstein patch-quilt (dnsseed_snipsnip, thermonyukyoolar_kleansing, kills-integer-retardation, ver_now_5_4_endless_name_string, zap_hardcoded_seeds, showmyip_crud, if anyone's interested).
Sun Aug 16 00:54:40 UTC 2015 <hanbot> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com//?date=11-08-2015#1235149 << for the record i bungled this, built a (seemingly working nevertheless) frankenstein patch-quilt (dnsseed_snipsnip, thermonyukyoolar_kleansing, kills-integer-retardation, ver_now_5_4_endless_name_string, zap_hardcoded_seeds, showmyip_crud, if anyone's interested).
Sat Aug 15 21:49:24 UTC 2015 <mod6> orchestra/rel2-pre.patch v. orchestra/test-v054-patches/rel2-pre-test.patch
Sat Aug 15 21:49:05 UTC 2015 <mod6> orchestra/rel1.patch v. orchestra/test-v0531-patches/rel1-test.patch
Sat Aug 15 21:48:09 UTC 2015 <mod6> So I've basically been able to reproduce both of your rel1.patch & rel2-pre.patch -- and I went through your patch with my script's created patch side by side by hand and verified the sha512s
Sat Aug 15 17:56:02 UTC 2015 <jurov> patch | tail -n +1 | sha512sum
Sat Aug 15 17:55:27 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> jurov: i get to checksum a patch by patch | sha512sum or basta.
Sat Aug 15 17:47:33 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: mno, for every patch and every sig ever made.
Sat Aug 15 17:47:18 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> wait. for every patch in the line, right ?
Sat Aug 15 17:46:42 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> because every single operation involves walking EVERY sig FOR EVERY patch
Sat Aug 15 17:37:43 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> 'Congratulations Gavin and Mike on completing the patch to support larger block sizes. Although we all have ideological disagreements from time to time, two fundamental values of the Bitcoin community are freedom of choice and transparency of communication. Your work represents a big step in returning the power over Bitcoin's future back to the community where it belongs.' << l0l!!
Sat Aug 15 17:32:08 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> patch must be accompanied with sig
Sat Aug 15 17:31:56 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> sig can be for existing patch in the list
Sat Aug 15 17:25:22 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 15-08-2015 16:54:38; mod6: asciilifeform: Are you planning on posting each patch (that we've since included in rel1, rel2) in a separate email to the list with a detached sig and included sha512?
Sat Aug 15 17:23:51 UTC 2015 <mod6> asciilifeform: ok cool! rel1.patch and rel2-pre.patch do apply cleanly to all of the existing patches
Sat Aug 15 16:54:38 UTC 2015 <mod6> asciilifeform: Are you planning on posting each patch (that we've since included in rel1, rel2) in a separate email to the list with a detached sig and included sha512?
Sat Aug 15 02:14:28 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mod6: just a replay of patch history, but this time with 'vdiff' in place of conventional diff
Sat Aug 15 00:14:39 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> to edit rel1.patch and rel2-pre.patch.