Matches for patch, 1691 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Aug 05 14:33:08 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> thinking of a modified unix-patch util that stuffs sha512 into comment preceding each file diff
Wed Aug 05 14:26:47 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: i once thought about placing antecedent hashes in patch headers
Wed Aug 05 14:25:37 UTC 2015 <punkman> with some metadata in diff files, we could have a script that creates a branched git repo entirely out of signed patch files
Wed Aug 05 04:53:56 UTC 2015 <decimation> thus, you need the whole repo state per patch
Wed Aug 05 04:53:37 UTC 2015 <decimation> which you can't get unless you have the whole repo stepped forward to the state of ap articular patch
Wed Aug 05 04:53:23 UTC 2015 <decimation> asciilifeform: for one thing, you would need to see the patch in context
Wed Aug 05 04:50:11 UTC 2015 <decimation> for each patch
Wed Aug 05 04:50:10 UTC 2015 <trinque> dev is its own concern which might have other processes; you could say that a particular feature branch eventually gets flattened down into a release patch
Wed Aug 05 04:49:58 UTC 2015 <decimation> it would be nice to have a button to click: download the 'original tree' plus patches to get to this patch
Wed Aug 05 04:36:48 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> see the text of the patch.
Wed Aug 05 04:36:08 UTC 2015 <decimation> asciilifeform: are the maps in question contained in your 'mempool zap patch'?
Wed Aug 05 04:30:28 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> ;;later tell ben_vulpes i have nothing against 'git', 'mercurial', etc., and even sometimes use these in civilian life, there is even somewhere ~horror~ a 'github' page with my name and some old crud, yes. but the ~canonical walk from pedigreed 0.5.3 to therealbitcoin~ has to be in .patch form!
Wed Aug 05 04:22:49 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> btw the db patch is not marked with antecedents because it has none (since last release)
Wed Aug 05 04:13:41 UTC 2015 <trinque> the patch signing is great, but it's not a process by itself
Wed Aug 05 04:11:21 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> if you're up to date on the patching, submit a patch and note its antecedents.
Wed Aug 05 03:56:25 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> not even a note in correction about "lol sry first patch doesn't work"
Wed Aug 05 03:55:32 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> so ofc i /try/ first patch
Wed Aug 05 03:55:24 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> second patch contained a link to mp's "dis wat i do, yo"
Wed Aug 05 03:55:08 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> just 'here's a patch, i'd better eat it'
Wed Aug 05 03:54:50 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> srsly, ben_vulpes managed to install the uncorrected patch in the minutes between it and the new one ??