home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for pgp, 1435 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Thu May 09 01:28:50 UTC 2013  <pgp>   good platform

Thu May 09 01:28:46 UTC 2013  <pgp>   I have several as well

Thu May 09 01:28:36 UTC 2013  <asciilifeform>   pgp: several, actually

Thu May 09 01:28:25 UTC 2013  <pgp>   ml605?

Thu May 09 01:27:53 UTC 2013  <pgp>   what kind of board?

Thu May 09 01:27:15 UTC 2013  <pgp>   dub: yes

Thu May 09 01:25:56 UTC 2013  <pgp>   any "weapons design" resources links that yo care to share?

Thu May 09 01:24:12 UTC 2013  <pgp>   asciilifeform: i like the way you think...

Thu May 09 01:23:33 UTC 2013  <pgp>   lol

Thu May 09 01:22:46 UTC 2013  <pgp>   so FPGA + checksum = really secure?

Thu May 09 01:20:39 UTC 2013  <pgp>   of course

Thu May 09 01:20:18 UTC 2013  <mircea_popescu>   pgp this is true of course.

Thu May 09 01:19:57 UTC 2013  <pgp>   noted... have you been reading about all sorts of "counterfeit" chips coming out of china with built in backdoors. Just because its hardware, doesn't mean it can be blindly trusted...

Thu May 09 01:15:21 UTC 2013  <pgp>   ?

Thu May 09 01:13:56 UTC 2013  <pgp>   but that requires a transaction to specify me as an output - what we need is a generalized method of paying a node operator who identity is not known at the time the transaction is submitted...

Thu May 09 01:10:49 UTC 2013  <asciilifeform>   pgp: just run a node that demands to be paid X satoshi before it relays transactions <=Y satoshi.

Thu May 09 01:10:18 UTC 2013  <pgp>   rectified

Thu May 09 01:10:01 UTC 2013  <pgp>   well, I suppose it could be reticified, but not easily...

Thu May 09 01:09:05 UTC 2013  <asciilifeform>   pgp: "fundamental" problem implies that it could not be dealt with other than by breaking the protocol, no?

Thu May 09 01:08:18 UTC 2013  <pgp>   i agree with mp - no fee for relay is a fundemental problem with bitcoin

« Previous Page    Next Page »