Matches for reputation, 448 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Fri Apr 03 01:39:28 UTC 2015 <Cogburn> gamification of reputation is for people who can't give a good handshake or a warm, geniune smile when they meet someone.
Fri Apr 03 01:20:00 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> bryce will also tell you that reputation doesn't matter either.
Wed Mar 25 06:59:42 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=24-03-2015#1068066 << a possible explanation is that jamaica has been turned by its reputation for "place for middle aged white women to come have a brown baby" into a very specific sort of strip joint.
Tue Mar 24 16:28:47 UTC 2015 <mats> and re: BSafe, i'm not convinced RSA could be sold on destroying their reputation for packing peanuts.
Sun Mar 22 21:17:17 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> mircea_popescu: when I first joined this channel at the collapse of GLBSE you said, "Scammers just help the legitimate businesses' reputation that much more." My friend this past year went on to say, "In the new world, the most trusted person need not to be liked, because well he's trustworthy. He/She could be a complete asshole if as long as they do their job."
Sun Mar 22 01:12:23 UTC 2015 <felipelalli> I'm sure I could set 2% rate or less and my list would be fund, because my reputation in Brazilian bitcoin community is very good. But now I have no choice rather than get 3.5% calculated like magic by them. That's why I was disgusted. I would write an article about that, but after talking with you guys in this channel I was unmotivated.
Sat Mar 21 19:11:49 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> felipelalli: the scam is that reputation is built nominally on btcjam vs. WoT
Sat Mar 21 18:58:22 UTC 2015 <felipelalli> and I didn't find anything very objective, but I guess you're trying to find clues that points something is weird. But after using the system, you can understand for example how joke is they reputation system.
Sat Mar 21 13:34:24 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 20-03-2015 21:10:47; felipelalli: mircea_popescu: Where can I find objective arguments against BTCJam? As a lending service and reputation system? And what are the alternatives for P2P lending or we don't have? They have 113,000 users, should they be ignored?
Fri Mar 20 21:26:50 UTC 2015 <felipelalli> nubbins`: but I would like to collect the cons arguments. I was using the service for a while and it was nice, except the reputation system. But yes, without a good reputation system, it is worthless. :/
Fri Mar 20 21:10:47 UTC 2015 <felipelalli> mircea_popescu: Where can I find objective arguments against BTCJam? As a lending service and reputation system? And what are the alternatives for P2P lending or we don't have? They have 113,000 users, should they be ignored?
Fri Mar 20 19:13:41 UTC 2015 <felipelalli> I know their reputation system is a crap.
Fri Mar 20 06:00:48 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 20-03-2015 00:55:00; asciilifeform: cazalla clearly has insufficient reputation for poverty
Fri Mar 20 06:00:48 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 20-03-2015 00:56:22; asciilifeform: cultivate this reputation.
Fri Mar 20 01:05:25 UTC 2015 <cazalla> asciilifeform, my reputation for poverty IRL might not match with what goes on here simply because the one thing i will spend money on is food/drink.. every unit i've rented furnished with second hand goods, i've purchased clothing from the same places (mind you, have not purchased clothing in at least 2 years)
Fri Mar 20 00:56:22 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> cultivate this reputation.
Fri Mar 20 00:55:00 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> cazalla clearly has insufficient reputation for poverty
Sun Mar 15 08:10:32 UTC 2015 <funkenstein_> that doesn't sound the the Theo reputation
Sat Mar 14 02:19:09 UTC 2015 <decimation> asciilifeform: supposedly panasonic has a good reputation in the passives market
Tue Mar 10 02:05:26 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 08-03-2015 18:49:19; asciilifeform: a good chunk of the reputation of linus t. is that he's been fairly effective at keeping a lid on this kind of thing, historically