Matches for spam, 1207 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Dec 20 17:12:13 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> neato, draining the spam
Mon Dec 12 16:39:27 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 12-12-2016 16:30:05; funkenstein_: example of wechat spam http://imgur.com/a/N0dxB
Mon Dec 12 16:30:05 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> example of wechat spam http://imgur.com/a/N0dxB
Sat Dec 10 19:46:09 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> the 'unsuccessful' infectors are not any less prevalent in the wild (e.g., collected from spam feeds)
Sat Dec 10 19:25:28 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> kakobrekla: situation resembled spam. i.e. a few folx made bank, the bulk of btc addrs found in samples from the wild -- empty
Thu Dec 01 00:43:12 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> and only slighly lesser idoiot when not spam attack
Thu Dec 01 00:42:57 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> which only idiot can come up with during spam attack
Tue Nov 29 18:17:11 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> the best that could be asked for was to turn each of the shitwares into, e.g., spam relay
Tue Nov 22 23:03:26 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> for today <100 sat/byte appears to be treated as spam https://bitcoinfees.21.co/
Tue Nov 22 23:01:43 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> high quality spam is ham.
Tue Nov 22 23:01:29 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> how does it make sense to attempt to distinguish 'plain use' from high quality spam ?
Tue Nov 22 23:00:35 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> was it spam attack or just plain use?
Thu Nov 17 17:07:05 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> also i will add that the suction of rss ~throttled~ the spam flood, rather than opposite
Thu Nov 17 17:03:38 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> so basically you are saying altrough rss sucks we still gonna have spam overload
Mon Nov 07 16:33:45 UTC 2016 <punkman> actually being against OP_RETURN is kinda being against S.DICE spam, isn't it?
Thu Oct 27 13:29:33 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> the coincidental spam attack folloed by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/a49b4a75a1b671492e65eed17d6894d85ea5ebfd
Wed Oct 26 14:09:39 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> i havent checked wtf is with the latest tx backlog but it sure does smell like another 'spam attack'
Thu Oct 20 16:31:56 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> strikes me as a labour-intensive and ultimately pointless slog, like keyword spam filtration.
Wed Sep 07 16:58:24 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> anyway im yet to recieve any spam from cb
Fri Aug 26 20:14:54 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> (this was not so 2y ago, when block spam did not yet exist, the db locks issue - not a thing, and it was actually possible to simply compile and run an old ver of bitcoin. presently, the ONLY way to operate a non-gaviniferous client is to use trb.)