Matches for spam, 1207 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Jul 08 21:11:04 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> though gotta wonder if this is still fair to say re: a gigantic sack of shit with the words 'this is spam, and fuck you' printed right on it
Wed Jul 08 21:09:13 UTC 2015 <trinque> IF IT HAS A FEE ATTACHED AND IS A VALID TXN, IT'S NOT SPAM
Wed Jul 08 21:08:56 UTC 2015 <trinque> same idiot argument re: spam as Luke-Jr
Wed Jul 08 20:18:15 UTC 2015 <decimation> if usg can spam uv over a large area for hours, then you probably have bigger problems than money
Wed Jul 08 15:19:21 UTC 2015 <funkenstein_> http://pastebin.com/EdtwCsw1 <-- just for fun i made signed 250kb TX sending 11 millies from "cat" spam address to thebitcoin.foundation treasury
Wed Jul 08 02:44:20 UTC 2015 <assbot> The current spam attack on Bitcoin is not economically feasible on Litecoin : Bitcoin ... ( http://bit.ly/1CZywvF )
Wed Jul 08 02:44:19 UTC 2015 <funkenstein_> speaking thereof: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ci25k/the_current_spam_attack_on_bitcoin_is_not/
Tue Jul 07 21:03:18 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> stress test demonstrates 1MB is plenty big to allow for periodic spam attacks, and bigger blocks would make bloat attacks still cheaper
Tue Jul 07 21:01:36 UTC 2015 <trinque> if someone really wants to "spam" let him pay the fees sufficient to do so, and he can keep that up for as many blocks as he likes, bidding against every other person who wants in the block
Tue Jul 07 20:56:35 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> the outputs must be old enough to not set off spam filters or whatever
Fri Jul 03 18:53:40 UTC 2015 <trinque> for some odd reason spam botnets don't seem to bother at all with tls being required
Fri Jul 03 18:53:07 UTC 2015 <trinque> jurov: could the btc-dev mailing list send mail via tls? requiring that on my mailserver's end has drastically cut down on spam, but I think that's causing me to miss mailing list messages
Wed Jul 01 06:21:20 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> <funkenstein_> like, ddosed << No, "Stress Tested" which means showing how great present anti-spam limit is because spammers
Wed Jul 01 04:06:16 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> Indeed, all they wanted was to spam boner pills and invent people for FakeBook profiles
Wed Jul 01 04:05:18 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> thought they were signing up for a quiet life of sending viagra spam
Fri Jun 26 03:06:45 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> specifically was done to simulate orphan spam.
Thu Jun 25 19:48:17 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> who says what tx is 'spam'? god ?
Thu Jun 25 19:48:08 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> thestringpuller: what i was trying to get across earlier is that the very concept of 'mempool spam' is presently undefined
Thu Jun 25 19:31:51 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> a sp4mz0r would have to spam with ~realistic~ tx
Thu Jun 25 19:31:43 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> thestringpuller: shooting the tx orphanage in the head rid us of the most obvious spam vector