home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for spam, 1207 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Tue Feb 10 15:54:28 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ... ... ( http://bit.ly/195ru0b )

Tue Feb 10 11:48:41 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   punkman depends how you select them. if well selected, something pretty cool i imagine. like, a world in which nobody is going to spam.

Tue Feb 10 03:57:58 UTC 2015  <BingoBoingo>   Another Mr Spam in the wild http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=142336024418555&w=2

Tue Feb 10 03:27:12 UTC 2015  <decimation>   asciilifeform: yeah he definitely exhibited that pattern. but my priors tend to 'random derp (maybe mr spam)' rather than 'usg agent'

Tue Feb 10 02:46:14 UTC 2015  <IHB>   so if we don't have the cap it is possible for a miner to load blocks up with spam? and this in turn will weaken the network?

Tue Feb 10 01:14:13 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   sic transit gloria spam-mundi then

Sat Feb 07 06:00:34 UTC 2015  <Guest70720>   hi now i can spam you like crazy for 30mins

Sat Feb 07 02:44:05 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   note to future stooges, moles: take some actual care to be distinguishable from comment spam on our www sites

Fri Feb 06 22:41:03 UTC 2015  <danielpbarron>   height=49141 and i'm getting lots of orphan spam, swap space is getting used now

Fri Feb 06 02:14:29 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 05-02-2015 07:23:19; punkman: phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop spam

Thu Feb 05 07:35:36 UTC 2015  <BingoBoingo>   <phillipsjk> It has and will change. The 1MB block limit was introduced to stop spam. You seem to be more militant than luke-Jr who called Bitcoin gambling sites spam. You appear to call all "trivial" transactions spam. << His definition of spam is both more complex and stupider than that

Thu Feb 05 07:24:06 UTC 2015  <fluffypony>   phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop spam.

Thu Feb 05 07:23:42 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop spam.

Thu Feb 05 07:23:19 UTC 2015  <punkman>   phillipsjk: the 1MB limit is not to stop spam

Thu Feb 05 07:22:57 UTC 2015  <phillipsjk>   It has and will change. The 1MB block limit was introduced to stop spam. You seem to be more militant than luke-Jr who called Bitcoin gambling sites spam. You appear to call all "trivial" transactions spam.

Thu Feb 05 06:30:53 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Permanently keeping the 1MB (anti-spam) restriction is a great idea ... ... ( http://bit.ly/1I6edUF )

Wed Feb 04 03:01:07 UTC 2015  <decimation>   who am I gonna spam?

Wed Feb 04 02:33:27 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   'only the dead shall see the end of spam'

Wed Feb 04 02:32:42 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   spam is over ?!

Wed Feb 04 02:31:16 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   we already know about the spam farms. it's over.

« Previous Page    Next Page »