Matches for spam, 1207 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Fri Dec 19 04:08:01 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> decimation: i'll take mr spam's word re: him having been paid to vandalize #b-a rather than -otc
Fri Dec 19 04:07:11 UTC 2014 <decimation> although one wonders why mr. spam targets this channel instead of -otc
Fri Dec 19 04:01:21 UTC 2014 <decimation> what if mr. spam learns the ip of a friend?
Fri Dec 19 03:59:24 UTC 2014 <decimation> asciilifeform: agreed, but it might be impractical. consider a 'firewall' that is checking mr spam's packets all day
Fri Dec 19 02:02:21 UTC 2014 <decimation> freenode seems to attract folks like mr. spam
Fri Dec 19 01:36:09 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> so mr spam will walk them.
Fri Dec 19 01:34:37 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> anything mr spam can get $maxint of purely by perl script is useless
Thu Dec 18 05:18:04 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> asciilifeform: I mean we have people apparently paying to send spam now!
Thu Dec 18 05:06:18 UTC 2014 <danielpbarron> 12:07 <+Luke-Jr> danielpbarron: "spam" and "fee" have no direct relationship << yes they do. if I spend an old output, no fee required; i spend a new output with no fee, tx doesn't get spread
Thu Dec 18 05:03:14 UTC 2014 <Luke-Jr> danielpbarron: "spam" and "fee" have no direct relationship
Thu Dec 18 05:02:16 UTC 2014 <danielpbarron> Luke-Jr, how can a transaction be "spam" when it pays a fee?
Thu Dec 18 04:56:55 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> Luke-Jr: Paying for a transaction is literally the definition of not spam.
Thu Dec 18 04:56:28 UTC 2014 <undata> Luke-Jr: you are avoiding addressing the deeper question of whether *you* have the right to decide for the whole network what constitutes spam
Thu Dec 18 04:56:27 UTC 2014 <Luke-Jr> BingoBoingo: tx fees != non-spam
Thu Dec 18 04:56:02 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> How is it spam if they pay tx fees?
Thu Dec 18 04:53:57 UTC 2014 <Luke-Jr> danielpbarron: the gambling front is just a way to get someone else paying the cost of bypassing Bitcoin's primary spam prevention (tx fees)
Thu Dec 18 04:53:07 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> Luke-Jr: the miners are happily incorporating the 'spam' into blocks.
Thu Dec 18 04:52:47 UTC 2014 <Luke-Jr> asciilifeform: who said Bitcoin was doomed? Bitcoin has this nice system of miners to address the spam problem.
Wed Dec 17 19:44:35 UTC 2014 <undata> Luke-Jr: what constitutes "spam" is an opinion
Wed Dec 17 19:44:20 UTC 2014 <Luke-Jr> spam != service; fact != opinion