home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for spec, 583 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Tue Mar 05 13:28:22 UTC 2019  <assbot>   SPOILER alert, literally: Intel CPUs afflicted with simple data-spewing spec-exec vulnerability • The Register ... ( http://bit.ly/2SJTSeO )

Fri Sep 21 17:44:06 UTC 2018  <funkenstein_>   that's a littme more than a factor of two better than their S9 miner spec

Fri Dec 01 21:08:07 UTC 2017  <punkman>   asciilifeform: find any horrible out-of-spec things in gnat yet?

Tue Oct 10 16:23:43 UTC 2017  <asciilifeform>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=10-10-2017#1477094 << have been looking, for same, for eons. tried just about everything ever sold that even vaguely looked like it could fit the spec (pocket size, runs MY linux rather than some nonsense )

Sun Sep 17 15:39:34 UTC 2017  <punkman>   "We used this memcpy to put the references on the stack so that the GC wouldn't free them; the compiler figured out that it could take the memcpy and the stack buffer out completely (by spec)"

Sun May 07 10:37:59 UTC 2017  <funkenstein_>   unrelated, has this already been reviewed here https://matrix.org/docs/spec/ ?

Tue Nov 22 21:14:11 UTC 2016  <kakobrekla>   asciilifeform hence 'out of spec' in the rating.

Tue Nov 08 13:58:03 UTC 2016  <punkman>   just gotta point deer make horse harder and software will implement declaration of spec?

Mon Nov 07 17:31:59 UTC 2016  <punkman>   according to my understanding of spec

Sun Jul 03 23:42:26 UTC 2016  <punkman>   there was a spec for the pow and such

Thu May 26 12:28:52 UTC 2016  <kakobrekla>   it used to be - but s.bbet and x.eur were the last two items of such spec.

Mon May 23 20:13:36 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   ben_vulpes: this as per the spec !

Wed May 18 19:49:30 UTC 2016  <funkenstein_>   "same cpu" must mean adhering to a certain minimum spec

Wed Apr 06 18:25:52 UTC 2016  <kakobrekla>   compromised, out of spec, in another chan

Tue Mar 29 02:50:05 UTC 2016  <phf>   if you're writing from scratch from a spec yes

Tue Mar 29 02:33:35 UTC 2016  <phf>   gpg is ok, it's forced to work with dodgy spec, rfc is horrendous though

Tue Mar 29 02:31:43 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   with its idiot 100 page spec, hardbaked sha-1, and other atrocities

Tue Mar 29 02:29:58 UTC 2016  <phf>   asciilifeform: it is same in official spec

Tue Mar 29 02:29:14 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   phf: in the unofficial gossipd spec, there is no global wot, but instead you ask your peer nodes whether they have rated $publickey

Tue Mar 29 01:17:08 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   phf: i operate from my spec.

  Next Page »