Matches for spec, 583 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Fri Aug 07 22:44:53 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> chetty no. the "use specified card, spec=future" thing is braindamaged. nobody has cards from the future.
Wed Aug 05 20:43:44 UTC 2015 <trinque> mike_c | really? hm. spec is lazy. << yup, everything in the browser has the squish of trying to be maximally permissive
Wed Aug 05 20:39:42 UTC 2015 <mike_c> really? hm. spec is lazy.
Wed Aug 05 20:39:28 UTC 2015 <trinque> mike_c: not required by the spec
Mon Jul 20 00:51:09 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=19-07-2015#1206513 << i didn't pour that spec in concrete.
Mon Jul 20 00:51:09 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 19-07-2015 19:46:27; asciilifeform: again, it wasn't in mircea_popescu's spec
Mon Jul 20 00:43:18 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> i dun see how they do anything. either they maintain compliance with tcp/ip spec as is, in which case they do nothing
Sun Jul 19 19:47:13 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> iirc he still thinks that ip as it exists now can be entirely abstracted over, and that the spec ought not mention details like packets
Sun Jul 19 19:46:27 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> again, it wasn't in mircea_popescu's spec
Sun Jul 19 19:44:11 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> but the aspect i'd like to emphasize - one which mircea_popescu thought to be an optional frill and did not include in his spec - is the single-packet authentication.
Sat Jul 11 02:26:24 UTC 2015 <Luke-Jr> decimation: Bitcoin's rules by nature are defined by the actual software people are using. If a "spec" disagrees with those de facto rules, the "spec" is wrong.
Sat Jul 11 02:25:39 UTC 2015 <Luke-Jr> decimation: because people might interpret it as a spec
Sat Jul 11 02:25:14 UTC 2015 <decimation> I mean a spec that desribes the behaviour of the entire codebase
Sat Jul 11 02:24:47 UTC 2015 <Luke-Jr> decimation: what? BIP 66 has been a spec since January
Sat Jul 11 02:24:07 UTC 2015 <decimation> Luke-Jr: this whole line of action strikes me as backwards. why not produce a spec before forcing changes from the de-facto standard?
Thu Jul 09 21:38:55 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> the us doesn't even have a fgucking missile spec sheet.
Thu Jul 09 18:01:19 UTC 2015 <decimation> yeah the ds3231 has the same spec for time performance
Thu Jul 09 16:36:33 UTC 2015 <decimation> my reading of the spec sheet is that combined aging and temperature stability (assuming 0-40C) would be about 8.5 ppm
Thu Jul 09 16:35:44 UTC 2015 <decimation> asciilifeform: www.ebay.com/itm/INBOARD-RTC-DS3232-Real-Time-Clock-and-Temperature-Sensor-I2C-BUS-PIC-AVR-ARM-/120841157983 < hi-spec part
Thu Jul 09 01:37:29 UTC 2015 <decimation> well, if that's a hard spec, and 'launch into space' is a hard spec, the project is a failure