Matches for spec, 583 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Mar 29 01:16:58 UTC 2016 <phf> ah that's a hypothetical gossipd behavior not in mp's spec
Tue Mar 29 00:44:17 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> in my view mp no longer represents the b-a idea as it was. (see: out of spec)
Mon Mar 28 23:45:30 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> however now, the element went bad - hence out of spec.
Mon Mar 28 18:17:27 UTC 2016 <phf> ben_vulpes: he's talking about mp, being a component that went out of spec
Mon Mar 28 18:13:18 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 28-03-2016 17:17:57; kakobrekla: one of the components went off and it is no longer in spec. if you wish to use it you may get it at the garbage collection site.
Mon Mar 28 18:10:58 UTC 2016 <ben_vulpes> what is this 'out of spec', kakobrekla ?
Mon Mar 28 18:09:10 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> out of spec element is crud.
Mon Mar 28 17:20:16 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> so you see it he is out of spec ?
Mon Mar 28 17:17:57 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> one of the components went off and it is no longer in spec. if you wish to use it you may get it at the garbage collection site.
Mon Mar 28 15:01:42 UTC 2016 <assbot> Successfully updated the rating for mircea_popescu from 5 to 10 with note: out of spec; the father of responsibility without accountability or liability; compromised by fiat world; dead to me;
Mon Mar 28 15:00:46 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> !rate mircea_popescu 10 out of spec; the father of responsibility without accountability or liability; compromised by fiat world; dead to me;
Wed Mar 23 19:37:42 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> whereas if spec had been 'winners will receive C coins on addr A from addr B at time T if condition Q' then there would be no puzzle.
Tue Mar 22 00:27:26 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> btw my emulated micropopescu is stabbing me with a sharpened toothbrush. is this a correct spec behaviour ?
Mon Mar 21 21:15:18 UTC 2016 <phf> main reason gpg is turd, because was written for dos and frozen into spec that way. provided functionally is composite and doesn't "do one thing well". instead of freeform key annotation has explicit "name, email, comment" fields, instead of easy way to spawn many keys, has a convoluted key hierarchy, etc.
Fri Mar 18 18:17:10 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=18-03-2016#1435802 < generally in favour - perhaps the 'actual assets' need a more tight spec?
Thu Mar 10 22:16:12 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> NO open mass spec.
Thu Mar 10 22:15:59 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> ie, the win98 item is 100k in cash + 4,5mn in fixing it to spec ; this is 340k in cash + 0 etc.
Thu Mar 10 21:36:32 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mass spec is the worst, came with isa card
Thu Mar 10 21:35:19 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> PeterL: was it a mass spec ?
Mon Mar 07 23:29:16 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> davout i don't mean it as an attack or anything. and the question of exploring the negative is open now and will remain open until spec.