Matches for spec, 583 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Feb 25 14:32:29 UTC 2015 <mats> as if Text Secure is usable, has a spec or docs like opengpg, as if mailpile doesn't shell out to a gpg binary
Tue Feb 24 23:37:19 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> Adlai: drafting them to spec is difficult sometimes. Like coming up with a good statement of work, or an SLA
Mon Feb 23 03:58:10 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> <asciilifeform> since we're on the subject, could someone enlighten me re: how 'tinder' does anything once the counterparties meet in the flesh? << Not in its spec. Hands this off to wetware
Sun Feb 22 20:52:43 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> the engineering spec, not written anywhere, is 'drug must make patient less apt to complain but oughtn't be detectably pleasurable'
Tue Feb 17 22:48:30 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> (these were rng boards, which are analogue devices and for which i have means of testing conformance to spec)
Mon Feb 16 03:58:03 UTC 2015 <mod6> ok. no problem. just trying to get it down to a spec
Mon Feb 16 03:45:37 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> just what the doctor ordered for proggys whose behaviour (and error modes) must follow rigorous spec, or user - dies.
Sun Feb 15 05:56:16 UTC 2015 <decimation> there's another angle to the 'open source cad' thing: autocad refuses to release the spec for their full-feature 'save' files
Sun Feb 15 05:33:42 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> ben_vulpes: but yes, if physics sims, output to heavy industry spec, etc. is your thing - winblows.
Tue Feb 10 23:29:16 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> shitgnomes lie, lie, but that would be inconsequential if the lies did not also take the form of bogus code that supposedly functions, but go and try to replicate. not one thing in ten works as described or to spec.
Sun Feb 08 20:32:49 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> im not even sure pgp has a spec.
Sun Feb 08 20:31:51 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> As for PGP, I'm assuming that I'm going to have to spend a decent amount of time with the codebase and reading the spec. Perhaps not.
Thu Feb 05 08:44:16 UTC 2015 <punkman> artifexd, maybe some relevant ideas for gossipd in that spec
Thu Feb 05 07:45:04 UTC 2015 <trinque> as per spec
Thu Feb 05 06:09:19 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> trinque: finished in the sense of there not remaining a single peripheral that could be described as not entirely working to spec ?
Thu Feb 05 02:52:07 UTC 2015 <Vexual> GAMMPool spec are a little thin, what do you actually wanna do?
Tue Feb 03 22:18:36 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> mircea_popescu: I have no idea for a better spec.
Tue Feb 03 20:11:32 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> and now im off to trilemize the dictionary/spec discussion, if anyone wants to be in ask now.
Tue Feb 03 19:58:43 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> i defy you to find a spec anywhere in use in the shitstack today that manages to not include things it really has no business specifying.
Tue Feb 03 19:58:00 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> but the only proper spec is a) actual spec b) fits in head c) because was created by actual person