Matches for spec, 583 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Oct 21 00:33:37 UTC 2013 <asciilifeform> here's an idea: generalize the altcoin concept and bake a turing-complete workfunction spec right into the protocol.
Sat Oct 12 03:28:54 UTC 2013 <bgupta> mircea_popescu: discussed previously? In IRC or elsewhere? (My issue with current implementations, is the key lengths they support are too short, but the latest version of the spec seems to address that)
Sat Oct 12 00:24:01 UTC 2013 <bgupta> Only issue I see with opengpg/gpg smartcards is that although the latest spec supports 4096bit keys, the current shipping devices don't..
Fri Oct 11 02:56:25 UTC 2013 <BingoBoingo> Fuck this is why Bitcoin needs a mother fucking Spec.
Thu Oct 10 21:18:33 UTC 2013 <mircea_popescu> so then 900 watt 440 gh is indeed in spec neh ?
Thu Oct 10 21:05:08 UTC 2013 <mircea_popescu> i forget what the spec was supposed to be
Thu Oct 10 21:02:54 UTC 2013 <jborkl> "KNC support just emailed me back saying that 440 ghash (what 50btc reports), 900 watts from the wall, and chip temps of 65-72c in a 58F room are 'within spec'...Not awesome."
Thu Oct 10 00:10:06 UTC 2013 <mircea_popescu> there, spec. why live on rumors.
Wed Oct 09 23:31:31 UTC 2013 <asciilifeform> without saying much more, the quick answer is: if some part of the draft spec seems illogical / bizzare / 'couldn't physically wurk', the answer is generally 'the obvious fix.'
Sun Sep 15 23:03:12 UTC 2013 <ThickAsThieves> making a spec, out on the open
Thu Sep 12 00:30:47 UTC 2013 <Duffer1> ya i saw that, they're really taking mining spec scam to a whole 'nother level
Sat Sep 07 17:51:02 UTC 2013 <fractal_> the unit must be > 400Gh, and < 400W.. the unit did not meet this performance spec
Sat Sep 07 16:36:50 UTC 2013 <fractal> mp: if bitfury sehipped more hardware, they changed the spec, and the bet was a yes..... you've contradicted yourself.
Sat Sep 07 16:35:01 UTC 2013 <fractal> heres another bullshit sentence -- "credibly show their sample ASIC chip working to specification" what is the specification? what is the timestamp of the spec? what if Labcoin changes spec during the bet?
Fri Sep 06 22:12:13 UTC 2013 <fractal> it failed to meet that spec
Tue Sep 03 15:31:55 UTC 2013 <ozbot> BitBet - Hashfast will deliver ASIC devices to spec before November 1st
Thu Aug 29 22:18:14 UTC 2013 <Neil> Closest I've seen to a spec is the wiki, and that's full of holes and exceedingly vague in places
Thu Aug 29 18:53:10 UTC 2013 <Anduck> jurov: the "will ship their 25ghash and 400gash units in time".. if there wasn't any 400 ghash units ordered in the first orders... but it's been proven that it can be built (why wouldn't it be possible? just attach the cards) and it will meet the spec
Thu Aug 29 18:32:34 UTC 2013 <Anduck> since it's proven that 400gh unit will meet the spec