home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for spec, 583 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Sun Feb 07 19:06:34 UTC 2016  <assbot>   Logged on 07-02-2016 18:47:08; punkman: http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:22

Sun Feb 07 18:47:08 UTC 2016  <punkman>   http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:22

Sun Feb 07 09:26:27 UTC 2016  <adlai>   re:CL, i suggest at some point taking http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-01-2016#1382968 seriously and going over the spec cover to cover, not to grok its content, but rather - the structure

Sat Feb 06 19:04:35 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   how biased the otp needs to be is part of the crc spec, for instance "every 8th bit may be a 1" etc.

Sat Feb 06 07:20:23 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   "We will make a spec for a perfectly standardized, $2500, cryogenically-cooled

Tue Feb 02 21:38:57 UTC 2016  <ascii_butugychag>   http://www.koehlke.com/media/MIL-Spec/Delphi-28840-connector.jpg << them

Tue Feb 02 15:37:58 UTC 2016  <trinque>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com//?date=02-02-2016#1393939 << I have time this weekend to give it a look. What's the spec here?

Mon Feb 01 22:08:45 UTC 2016  <ascii_butugychag>   btw between that thread and now i went and read the keccak spec

Sun Jan 31 19:43:18 UTC 2016  <adlai>   lemme put it another way... somewhere in the ANSI spec are probably one, two, or even three ~hundred~ symbols which the weaponized bitcoind-os does not need in its guts. define-setf-expander? define-method-combination? where do you draw the line?

Sat Jan 16 22:43:41 UTC 2016  <pete_dushenski>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=16-01-2016#1372540 << cxt is supah-bad-ass. problem is... it's $100k. there's no el cheapo entry-level spec for 1/3 price as in F-150, etc.

Wed Jan 13 00:56:42 UTC 2016  <gabriel_laddel>   mircea_popescu: have you tried reading the OpenGL spec?

Tue Jan 12 20:58:40 UTC 2016  <trinque>   mircea_popescu: your comment about symbolics murdering the competition and saying "here is the spec" for example.

Tue Jan 12 04:47:23 UTC 2016  <phf>   bringing this into char discussion makes no sense whatsoever because spec explicitly says you can't

Tue Jan 12 04:46:11 UTC 2016  <phf>   you can't make any statements about chars using eq. eq is a special beast used to test ~von neumann~ identity. and all the comments in the spec are related to that. sometimes (eq 1 1) but (eq 123123 123123) is not

Tue Jan 12 04:16:53 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   nothing wrong with "fuck you, you're childrten, go away. this is the spec."

Wed Dec 30 21:16:17 UTC 2015  <mod6>   that's root, you techincally can put that after any tld and it will work as long as it conforms to the spec

Sat Dec 26 06:08:35 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   crlf is in the fucking spec?!

Mon Dec 21 04:33:27 UTC 2015  <punkman>   problem is how do you make a spec out of 1mil lines of C

Sat Dec 05 04:33:23 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 05-12-2015 04:25:09; mircea_popescu: the spec accounts for this, that there should be a hook there. otherwise i fully expect most people will just use the standard dictionary if they ever use the mode at all.

Sat Dec 05 04:25:09 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   the spec accounts for this, that there should be a hook there. otherwise i fully expect most people will just use the standard dictionary if they ever use the mode at all.

« Previous Page    Next Page »