Matches for strings, 295 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Jun 17 23:25:38 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> (i.e. connecting gavinized nodes masquerading under old version strings)
Sat Jun 13 16:48:12 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 14-11-2014 21:29:47; asciilifeform: the idea in the article can (and has) been rephrased like this. if you remove all the 'suggestively-named strings' like 'understand' - and replace with 'gensyms' - e.g., 100324 - does the resulting machine still do or even appear to do anything of interest?
Fri May 22 01:35:30 UTC 2015 <mod6> <+jurov> mod6, ben_vulpes, everyone: http://bluesky/ml/test/patches.html needs to manually fill data for "Released in/Based on" columns - just version strings for every patch, help appreciated << this is 404 for me.
Fri May 22 00:36:13 UTC 2015 <jurov> mod6, ben_vulpes, everyone: http://bluesky/ml/test/patches.html needs to manually fill data for "Released in/Based on" columns - just version strings for every patch, help appreciated
Thu May 21 13:02:05 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=21-05-2015#1141772 << the interesting thing is the blindness of this stereotypical character to items which -could- exist but cannot be brought into existence through traditional methods - planning, hiring, management. ergo items which could exist if you gave $raggedlispdervish a bathtub of benjies no-strings, do not and cannot exist because this is rather like asking $capitalist to stick hi
Sun May 17 17:58:55 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> i was never strongly interested in the version strings. anyone can write what he wants.
Sun May 17 16:55:57 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> python strings alf. python strings.
Tue May 05 16:42:38 UTC 2015 <kakobrekla> from some random source, and I quote; " * Module to easily and possibly securily sign strings."
Tue May 05 04:13:33 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 05-05-2015 01:52:03; trinque: aside that it just strings together analogies
Tue May 05 01:52:03 UTC 2015 <trinque> aside that it just strings together analogies
Wed Apr 29 08:03:40 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> I'd like to clarify that what I'm finding appaling here is the huge amount of effort spent generating syntatically correct strings.
Wed Apr 29 07:28:14 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> 7. http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=28-04-2015#1113989 << When I change the argument list, rename a procedure, use an unnamed reference why are the holes not marked or filled? Why must I manually declare my local variables and functions? Can't the current top level expression be searched for occurrences then factored out on a keystroke? Why must I balance strings, whatever the level of nesting or escaping? Can th
Mon Apr 27 03:22:29 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> <jurov> maybe the only difference is computer science was constructed from mathematical (or not very mathematical, like strings) ideas ... << the notion that computing machines, as presently constructed, have some direct connection with what maths folks did in the 1930s is nebulous at best. even if commonly believed
Sun Apr 26 22:17:42 UTC 2015 <jurov> maybe the only difference is computer science was constructed from mathematical (or not very mathematical, like strings) ideas, where cunts evolved themselves somehow
Sun Apr 26 03:42:35 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> and you can't do regexp on your "Strings"
Sun Apr 26 03:42:05 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> it's all strings, but w/e.
Sun Apr 26 03:41:52 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> you're using fake lisp strings.
Sun Apr 26 03:41:44 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> I use strings all the time, don't use regexes
Sun Apr 26 03:41:29 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> that's what strings are. "stuff you use regexps on"
Sun Apr 26 03:40:17 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> wtf is this. lisp doesn't have strings?