Matches for test, 2087 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sun Mar 01 08:34:20 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> none took the time to test it out
Sun Mar 01 08:30:20 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> same problem as aids test meaning here, that i'm much more interested in the folks left bugling in the dark
Sun Mar 01 08:29:28 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> it has same problem as the aids test
Sun Mar 01 07:25:59 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> they'll test.
Sun Mar 01 07:23:58 UTC 2015 <decimation> AFQT means 'armed forces qualifying test'
Sun Mar 01 05:23:34 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: the conclusive test requires the torsion rotor
Sun Mar 01 05:10:48 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> mircea_popescu: but this is not germane to the issue. << Oh, but it is. These people are prepared to lie at every turn. See the stack overflow post, or the output of the Eot-wash group. If Al or Stan were make a mistake in the run, they'd never be able to test it again.
Sun Mar 01 05:07:52 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> The Eot-wash group won't test this. And the string theorist in that stackoverflow question is more than happy to state that because a large construction of molecules falls at the speed we expect it to, it couldn't possibly happen on a small scale.
Sun Mar 01 05:06:22 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> But you have to test it.
Sun Mar 01 05:06:19 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> What Al would like to test is pretty simple. Is gravity mirror-symmetric? If it is, then you can drop two stereoisomers in a vacuum, and they'll fall at the same rate. We don't know that this is the case, and the universe actually violates mirror-symmetry on many scales. Perhaps a violation will be observable.
Sun Mar 01 04:31:12 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: i devised a test costing approximately 50k usd.
Fri Feb 27 02:04:06 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> 'Due to the well-known fact that all compilers have bugs, it is the conventional wisdom of the safety critical community to avoid assuming that the generated object code is automatically correct. For instance, the approach taken in the avionics standard DO-178B is one of Design, Review and Test [DO-178B]. As far as practical, the review and test activities are undertaken at the object code level. Indeed, if the reliability req
Thu Feb 26 21:50:54 UTC 2015 <nubbins`> we call this "test driven development"
Thu Feb 26 21:22:39 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> it's worth doing on a test network just to count subtle bugs.
Thu Feb 26 18:22:12 UTC 2015 <kakobrekla> ah i thought we were talking bitcoind sync test or some such
Thu Feb 26 17:02:01 UTC 2015 <trinque> +mircea_popescu | <trinque> http://deedbot.org/ << there be deeds << cool. why are some repeated ? << test values; I published bundles with the same messages a few times while working
Thu Feb 26 13:06:38 UTC 2015 <kakobrekla> !rate assbot 1 test
Thu Feb 26 12:40:10 UTC 2015 <trinque> at least test ones
Thu Feb 26 08:28:16 UTC 2015 <kakobrekla> !rate assbot 1 test
Tue Feb 24 13:16:25 UTC 2015 <Adlai> "sorting algorithm" sounds a bit like "intelligence test"