Matches for test, 2087 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sat Sep 06 02:27:21 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> 'The test bed aircraft (74-2065) was ready for its first test flight on September 18, 1980, just three weeks after the project was initiated.' <<< picture modern usg doing anything whatsoever on this schedule.
Sat Sep 06 02:19:54 UTC 2014 <decimation> mircea_popescu: I don't think any plane would survive that test
Thu Sep 04 17:56:22 UTC 2014 <nubbins`> chair was a bend-test, i don't keep other packages on the deck so i had to make do with what was around 8)
Thu Sep 04 17:31:44 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> that shot looks like the fucking "alice in wonderland corner test facility"
Wed Sep 03 20:23:33 UTC 2014 <kuzetsa> this time, as a test I tried a nearby vendor (no crash) then went back to the one I had problems with and it was reproducable & crashed yet again
Tue Sep 02 16:17:15 UTC 2014 <xanthyos> 29-08-2014 02:21:27 <BingoBoingo> <mircea_popescu> what's this fresh danielpbarron drama BigBitz ? << My best impression is he is trying to WoT up a bunch of local acquaintances and... old tensions and dramas come forth, but I lack context to interpret severity... << it's a good test case for the aphorism "familiarity breeds contempt" when wot ratings are inversely proportional to how well someone is known
Mon Sep 01 14:31:49 UTC 2014 <nubbins`> generally whenever you change emulsion/lights, you have to pull out the test strips and recalibrate your times
Sun Aug 31 23:23:52 UTC 2014 <nubbins`> that's destined for life as a permanent test print
Sun Aug 31 02:20:11 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> if you want to know what test - bring schwartz out of his hidey hole, wherever it is, and ask him. he enjoys explaining it, me - it just depresses
Sun Aug 31 02:17:56 UTC 2014 <assbot> Logged on 27-07-2014 19:05:02; asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: in 2010 i concocted a variant of the test that could be carried out for approx. 50k USD, from scratch. schwartz answered that, in his estimation, the test would work to spec, but results would not be accepted by the field unless carried out on one of the two existing eotvos balances. one - adelberger's, one - chicom.
Sat Aug 30 21:36:42 UTC 2014 <assbot> Wahoo and Umbrella - Filmmaker recounts nuclear test - YouTube
Sat Aug 30 07:25:42 UTC 2014 <pete_dushenski> asciilifeform: looks like conformal co. passed the 'test.' << with flying colours!
Sat Aug 30 03:11:43 UTC 2014 <assbot> Block 222996 - TEST Bitcoin Block Explorer
Sat Aug 30 01:54:14 UTC 2014 <MolokoDesk> bundling the documents every 5 minutes or so. and storing the hash of that. I was focusing too much on indivdual documents. The bundling feature was in my unit test notes.
Sat Aug 30 01:41:51 UTC 2014 <RagnarDanneskjol> test msg http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=5hrDQdR4
Sat Aug 30 00:59:00 UTC 2014 <MolokoDeck> not sure I want the test server's URL going into a channel log though.
Fri Aug 29 16:30:22 UTC 2014 <pankkake> "I prefer test-to-fail instead of test-to-pass type development" :)
Fri Aug 29 16:27:12 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> looks like conformal co. passed the 'test.'
Fri Aug 29 01:08:46 UTC 2014 <pete_dushenski> i test drove one… and broke it
Thu Aug 28 23:28:08 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> <asciilifeform> so - how long does conformal corp. have before one should conclude they failed the 'test' (approved mircea_popescu's comment) ? << Another possibility may be retarded/ovezealous/otherwise poisoned spam filtering.