Matches for test, 2087 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Thu Feb 04 03:58:24 UTC 2016 <mod6> I'll keep this in mind as a test case.
Thu Feb 04 03:58:18 UTC 2016 <mod6> ok, thanks, i've been working on a fix for a similar thing, actually, which is related to a similar test by ben_vulpes -- but haven't completed it yet.
Thu Feb 04 03:23:57 UTC 2016 <mod6> In regards to the above email section 0x04: To test this, one can simply grab polarbeard's vpatch and sig and drop them into place, then try to press the entire tree. This should hault throwing an error since the actual output hash does not match the ~expected~ output hash.
Wed Feb 03 18:03:57 UTC 2016 <mod6> I'll probably just send the patch to the ML to recruit people to help me test over the next two weeks.
Wed Feb 03 05:17:09 UTC 2016 <pete_dushenski> ^a test. you might see me logging in as 'pete_d_out' in the next week or so. if you do, please to +v!
Tue Feb 02 22:24:20 UTC 2016 <mod6> meanwhile, I'll work on an automated test for this change and work on republishing this fix as a one change deal. will be v99995
Tue Feb 02 21:20:07 UTC 2016 <mod6> im just trying to be sure, im already pretty sure... but i wanted you to look/test so i dont end up with more on my plate
Tue Feb 02 21:09:53 UTC 2016 <mod6> right this is actually a really good test case.
Tue Feb 02 21:00:24 UTC 2016 <mod6> if anyone else is in the middle of creating a patch - maybe hold off a day or so before you submit until I can straighten out the tree & test everything.
Tue Feb 02 15:46:41 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> jurov respectfully an' all that, but : didn't we test dpaste and it came out that it mangled nothing ?
Tue Feb 02 13:17:15 UTC 2016 <mod6> <+asciilifeform> ;;later tell mod6 http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-02-2016#1393787 << these look ok, i will test and sign when i get a chance << cool, thx!
Tue Feb 02 13:17:15 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 02-02-2016 06:22:46; mod6: give these a compile & quick test if you don't mind and then upon confirmation, I'll update the mirror.
Tue Feb 02 13:02:45 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> ;;later tell mod6 http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-02-2016#1393787 << these look ok, i will test and sign when i get a chance
Tue Feb 02 13:02:45 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 02-02-2016 06:22:46; mod6: give these a compile & quick test if you don't mind and then upon confirmation, I'll update the mirror.
Tue Feb 02 06:22:46 UTC 2016 <mod6> give these a compile & quick test if you don't mind and then upon confirmation, I'll update the mirror.
Tue Feb 02 02:57:07 UTC 2016 <mod6> lemme compile & test with the new patches + shiva 1 & 2 + fix
Tue Feb 02 02:14:58 UTC 2016 <jurov> i just happened to stumble upon it cuz vulpes' test data has only one - alf's signature per patch
Mon Feb 01 21:18:28 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> mircea_popescu: i can see it. sorta 'shit test', anyone who proposes any fork which refuses it, has to answer for himself
Mon Feb 01 19:03:16 UTC 2016 <mod6> compiled just fine, just kicked it off for a quick test...
Mon Feb 01 15:34:25 UTC 2016 <Tasoshi> So Satoshi's great test to determine whether bitcoin can operate through decentralised consensus is now on. mircea_popescu, I have been looking at some old posts and it seemed that in 2013 you agreed with Satoshi and his vision. What exactly did you learn in 2013 to turn yourself against Satoshi's vision itself?